Wearing or displaying attributes of the opposite sex is no proof of gayness in the GPR.Failing an explanation to the contrary,it could be regarded as an heterosexual interest. [..]
Ok, wearing a cloth is not enough to count as gay, but also does not prohibit a gay from being a gay, correct? This is acceptable in principle.
[..] Sorting males from females is a matter of sperm and eggs in the GPR.The normative system of the GPR has adopted a position based on what individuals display and which can be verified.Not what they feel and which is beyond any verification.
Unfortunately, this is an approach which concerns the bedrooms and therefore the behavior is as well difficult to verify as the feelings. Who is going to control what a man and a woman or a man and a man do in a flat, when they visit each other? Any factual "proof" of homosexuality would require fascistoid state structures, and I am sure non of us would propagate this approach.
Surely, anyone who openly lives a heterosexual life can
not be regarded as gay, no matter what his feelings might be. The weak point of the GPR's definition is that it contemplates not only the current behavior, but also the past which might lay 10 or 40 years ago. You ought accept that humans develope in the course of their lives and not everyone was so lucky to discover his/her true sexuality with 12.
Besides, what is with those who have no sex at all, because they are to shy or too ugly?

There are
only feelings and no factual behavior in these cases. How are you going to define their sexual orientation while disregarding their feelings entirely?