Jon, Viktor, Don,
Good to hear from all of you. I must be slowing down. I missed this posting until now.
I am not gloating over the failure of the idea, of a Gay and Lesbian Kingdom, because that is what I still espouse.
I do take a certain satisfaction in the demise of the old kingdom, especially its upper eschelons.
As I told Jon, Bill, Dale, and Enrique many times. You can not have a superior body to an elected Parliament, since it represents the citizens of a nation. The citizens are what it is all about. Making a kingdom FOR a monarch, instead of for the commons is absolutely medieval thinking, and a fatal flaw.
I essayed to place constitutional reform on the fast track, and to also get at the truth. What futures might have been if those efforts had been allowed? Heavy sigh

Another cancer that would have eaten a hole in the body politic was the nonsense about getting Cato for the wrongs done by the government of Australia. After I left for the Commonwealth, I contacted, through a lawyer friend, the head of the Harvard School of International Law, Dr. Anne Slaughter, about this premise. In a word, it is nonsense.
And as for the International Court hearing this, more nonsense. It hears this sort of thing...between established nations. Not a nation and a non territorial group that doesn't live in the contested area.
Now if you LIVED there, for some time, and ACTED like a sovereign nation, and got other nations to de facto recognize this, even in minor ways, THEN you have something. A lot of this is referenced in the American Journal of International Law.
Be that as it may....of all the officials of the old kingdom, I think that you, Jon, and the PC member "FemontBridgeMan"
(I forget his name) were the most sincere, and hard working, and for you gentlemen, I'm truly sorry it didn't work out.

But if I can butcher some metaphors.....there is no sense crying over spilt milk over the dam

We should just go on with whatever efforts we individually, or jointly, feel are worthwhile.
Pleasant day to all,
Jaix