We will have to be cautious,so as no to interfere in the domestic affairs of other States,at least those which are friendly or not hostile to us.Not even over the matter of their treatment of the local gay minority. [...] they would go down fighting in a way,either sending us information,or causing the vertical emigration of some mullah here and there. [..]
My personal belief is that such a thing like "foreign domestic affairs" does not exist at all, whenever the interests of a state are concerned. The only issue to be discussed is the form in which one state intrudes into "domestic affairs" of another state. If our people are suffering oppression or are endangered, we must take actions suitable to help them. Wherever our nationals express concerns about their situation, the global "gay government" shall address the problem. It would be wise, of course, to do this in a way with regard to particular situation in that countries: a gay-friendly foreign government can be contacted on diplomatic channels without any unnecessary discomposure, whereas some hostile fundamentalists can be moved out of our way by less diplomatic means. If president of one country gives unsolicited advices to the government of the neighbouring state, it is clearly an offensive action and will entail serious tensions. If special funds of the same president generously support a number of dissident NGO's in the neighbouring country, this is simply "humanitary aid" and hardly can cause a public scandal.
[..] It is out of question that we confer the citizenship of a Republic of ours to permanent residents of foreign hethro countries,even if they are gays. [..]
Why so? I see absolutely no reason why gays permanently residing in other countries shall be deprived of the opportunity to attain the citizenship of the Gay State. On contrary, regarding our natural abundance in the world, we might very well face the cituation when most of our citizens are liveng abroad. This will be, in particular, the case if the Gay State will posess no territory, or the territory under its control will be to small to accomodate any significant population. The state shall unite as many gays as possible under its governance, both to increase its political and economical weight, and "to bring together what naturally belongs together". In no way can I agree to the notion that gays in Diaspora shall be deprived of the beneficence and protection of the Gay State.
In one point you have right, of course – it is out of question that the Gay State might entertain governmental sub-divisions on a foreign souvereign territory. Gay communities "abroad" will have to be self-ruled in compliance with local legislations, and will be, as organizations, no subjects of the Gay State. These communities will, however, entertain close relationship to the Gay State, and
members of these communities very well may participate in political life of the Gay State through representatives etc. In some countries it shall be possible to re-claim some part of taxes by a contract with the local governments.
We must, of course, discuss the prerequisits for obtaining the citizenship – and the consequences for the citizen of any given state of residency. In some countries, dual citizenship is allowed, in other countries (e.g. in Germany) the "old" citizenship is lost by attaining "new" citizenship. For such countries, we will have to find creative solutions, which would allow gay individual to participate in the political life of the gay state, without facing unnecessary practical difficulties in the country of his residency. Certainly, we will need also a couple or two heroes, but the vaste majority of the gay population shall not be forced into artificial difficulties. My suggestion is to introduce, along with full citizenship, the category "affiliate" of the Gay State – a kind of second-class citizenship, guaranteeing some basic rights and connected to vew obligations. Though one might feel uncomfortable contemplating the status of "second-class citizenship", this solution would be certainly better than obtaining no citizenship at all.
Furthermore, the competencies of local authorities of the Gay State, and the "Global Gay Government" must be clearly separated. There is no reason why citizens living abroad shall have the right to interfere with internal politics on the territory of the Gay State, or why the local authorities shall have the unrestricted right to speak for the entire gay population of the planet. The actual legal framework is negotiable and is subject of much more elaborated discussion that is possible in this thread (basically, we could either introduce 2 institutions, or guarantee certain amount of seats within the parliament for representatives from Diaspora).
[..] we will need [..] diplomatic relations in order to be able to conduct normal political business beyond the limits of our country.As for myself,I`d prefer gay immigration by regular methods,that is applicants in a gay embassy or consulate abroad [..]
Certainly – the consulate is very suitable not only for processing immigrants, but for maintaining good relations both with the local Diaspora and with the host country. The political, economical and cultural interests of the Gay State would be best served in a civilized procedure. Though, ther will be an amount of countries, where gays will have to go abroad under wrong premises (here I remember my own elopement from the collapsing Soviet Union – knowing that my documents were processed, I went on travel with tourist visum).
[..] Another matter to be discussed will be the classification of hethro countries in good,bad or indifferent,or in whatever other category we may see fit.We have to do this before we define the ways and means of our own international political line. [..]
Whereas it is generally a good thing to entertain good relationships with as many countries as possible, some countries will leave us no choice as to be treated as hostile. More precisely, we shall speak of hostile governments – keeping in mind, that 7-10 % of inhabitants are gays or lesbians. This brings us into the difficult situation that in case of open conflict we have a considerable amount of our people kept as hostages by the enemy. Therefore the gay government will have to consider very carefully its words and actions – sometimes it is required to act undercover, whereby the actions themeselves can be very well of unfriendly nature. If some governments practically declare war on gays, these governments and governmental property shall be targeted with no restrictions – but the populations of those countries be spared from any collateral damage.
[..] those gays of the future [..] might not have to decide to become or not to become a member of the UN,for the obvious simple reason the UN will have left the stage of world politics and history as its ancestor the League of Nations did in 1939. [..]
It is in vane to discuss global issues of tomorrow – every generation of politicians must deal with geopolitical situation of their times. It might come as you say, but it also might come different – in any case, the existence of the state must be preserved, and the interests of the gay people as whole be served in the best way possible. The interests of the future generations of gays must be taken into account as well.